Prevent an item from being linked to itself. o, -overwrite If they exist already, read abd overwrite output r, -readonly Do not allow changes or save annotations. hh, -hide-help Do not show help on startup. ld, -log-debug Provide detailed logging. c CONFIG_FILE, -config-file CONFIG_FILEĪ file containing configuration information. As a result of compromise formation, transference is both a symptom and a daydream, one among other artificial structures created by the Ego with which it attempts to work through an underlying conflict.= An illusion: this is what transference is about. Although there is a tendency to get to know the other, and transference is a kind of bridge that encourages this, in the same movement the other goes unacknowledged, it is ‘covered’ by transference in order to preserve the narcissistic illusion. When transference is dissolved, reality can be appreciated as ‘otherness’. According to Abadi, it is this that marks the difference between psychoanalysis and other kinds of therapies. Therefore, the analytic process consists in helping the patient acknowledge, at some point, that the other is another and not a part of himself. Abadi traces the origins of transference back to the early times of the child’s experience of abandonment, with which he/she deals by introducing this ‘other’ while at the same time disavowing his own dependence. The ‘other’ is therefore invaded, penetrated, colonized, and infiltrated by parts of one’s own Ego. However, narcissism encourages one to transform this other into a part of oneself, thus refusing to acknowledge the painful, distressing dependence (disavowal). This narcissistic relationship will try to take possession of an object that initially presents itself as an other in other words: there is a relationship with someone who, by virtue of not being me, can therefore protect me. That is to say that transference constitutes a narcissistic relationship with a supporting object (an anaclitic relationship) without which transference would be impossible.
This ‘other’ that appears in transference will be invested with affects, imagos, and parts of the Ego, which will transform the relationship into a narcissistic one.
Thus, Abadi suggests that there is transference of images and transference of relationships.
During the process of transference two people become changed by it: the patient that ‘transfers’ to himself the image of the child he once was, and the relationship he had with the object, and the ‘other’, the relational object onto whom the patient transfers the image. Abadi, by using the model of staging, expresses the view that transference hardly involves the mere recovery of experiences, but rather constitutes a kind of collage where the infantile aspects are combined, connected, with aspects that belong to the subsequent development of the individual, which offer new meaning and significance to the former ones ( Nachträglichkeit ). These are phantoms from childhood that hold the subject captive. Within transference a ‘process of presentification’ is produced, an evanescent presence that actualises the past, dissolves absence and makes things happen in a magical, illusory way. Not only transference is responsible for the analysand’s love, but any kind of love is transference love. Transference (Übertragung), according to Abadi, is the substitution and displacement (Verschiebung) of affects from an object to another, substitute, object. IPA Inter-Regional Encyclopedic Dictionary of PsychoanalysisĮvery human being is an active agent of transport (a notion connected to the term transference) towards an object, an agent of substitutions.
0 kommentar(er)
